KOSEN 한인과학기술자네트워크

Contents Chapter 1 Introduction - INS' Current IT Investment Efforts - Recent Reviews Have Identified IT Project Management Weaknesses - Overview of INS' Current Approach to IT Investment Management - Framework for Assessing Agencies' IT Investment Management - Objectives, Scope, and Methodology Chapter 2 INS lacks foundation capabilities upon which to build IT investment management maturity - INS has established an IRB, but has not developed policies and procedures to Govern IRB Operations - INS is not efectively Overseeing its ongoing IT projects - INS is not tracking and using IT Asset information for investment management purposes - INS has not defined business needs for all its IT projects - INS has a structured process for selecting new IT Proposals but has not consistently analyzed them according to established criteria Chapter 3 INS is not managing its IT investments as a complete portfolio - INS has not created useful portfolio selection criteria - INS does not analyze its it investments based on cost, benefit, schedule, and risk data when making investment decsions - INS does not comparatively assess all its IT projects when making selections for funding - INS does not oversee IT investments' cost, benefit, schedule, and risk performance Chapter 4 The department of justice is not guiding and overseeing INS' investment management approach Chapter 5 Conclusions, recommendations, and agency comments - Recommendations for executive action - Agency comments and our evaluation